91视频

?
  • Law Asia
  • ABLJ
  • CBLJ
  • IBLJ
Register Login Subscribe
  • English
    • 中文 (Chinese (Simplified))
Resources
Awards galleryChina Business Law Directory - PRC law firmsChina Business Law Directory - Cross-border investment guide
Sections
NewsBusiness law digestDispute digestIn-house insightsPractitioners’ perspectivesCorrespondentsMarket watchLegal & regulatory insightsLexicon
91视频
New Company LawIntellectual propertyDispute resolutionCross-border investmentCapital marketsBankruptcy & reorganisation
91视频 home
Archive
.TV
Awards
Events
Jobs
About us
Contact us
Follow 91视频
?
China Business Law Journal
English English
  • 中文 中文
China Business Law Journal
?
    • Whatsapp
      Copy link

      SECTIONS

      • News
      • Business law digest
      • Dispute digest
      • In-house insights
      • Practitioners’ perspectives
      • Correspondents
      • Market watch
      • Legal & regulatory insights
      • Lexicon

      ABOUT US

      • Editorial board
      • Publisher & credits

      TOPICS

      • New Company Law
      • Intellectual property
      • Dispute resolution
      • Cross-border investment
      • Capital markets
      • Bankruptcy & reorganisation

      RESOURCES

      • Awards gallery
      • China Business Law Directory - PRC law firms
      • China Business Law Directory - Cross-border investment guide

      E-READER EDITION

      ARCHIVE
      Whatsapp
      Copy link
China Business Law Journal China Business Law Journal
  • Sections
    • News
    • Business law digest
    • Dispute digest
    • In-house insights
    • Practitioners’ perspectives
    • Correspondents
    • Market watch
    • Legal & regulatory insights
    • Lexicon
  • 91视频
    • New Company Law
    • Intellectual property
    • Dispute resolution
    • Cross-border investment
    • Capital markets
    • Bankruptcy & reorganisation
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • CBLJ Forum ? Beijing 2026: Report
    • CBLJ Forum ? Shanghai 2025: Report
    • CBLJ Forum ? Beijing 2025: Report
    • Other events
  • Law Asia
  • ABLJ
  • CBLJ
  • IBLJ
  • icon
    • Login
    • Register
  • Law Asia
  • ABLJ
  • CBLJ
  • IBLJ
?
China Business Law Journal
  • Sections
    • News
    • Business law digest
    • Dispute digest
    • In-house insights
    • Practitioners’ perspectives
    • Correspondents
    • Market watch
    • Legal & regulatory insights
    • Lexicon
  • 91视频
    • New Company Law
    • Intellectual property
    • Dispute resolution
    • Cross-border investment
    • Capital markets
    • Bankruptcy & reorganisation
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Jobs
  • Subscribe
  • Events
    • CBLJ Forum ? Beijing 2026: Report
    • CBLJ Forum ? Shanghai 2025: Report
    • CBLJ Forum ? Beijing 2025: Report
    • Other events
English English
  • 中文 中文
  • icon
    • Login
    • Register
Home AllBright Law Offices Gauging impact of US FATCA on corporate compliance practice
  • AllBright Law Offices

Gauging impact of US FATCA on corporate compliance practice

By Dong Jinsong and Fan Xiaoliang, AllBright Law Offices
30 June 2017
0
2807
Whatsapp
Copy link

Found at the heart of the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) are the information reporting and tax withholding systems, that is to say they require foreign financial institutions to report to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) information on the foreign accounts of US taxpayers or information on the financial accounts of foreign entities that have substantial US owners. Foreign financial institutions that fail to comply with their information reporting obligations will be assessed 30% withholding tax on certain income (stock dividends, interest, insurance premiums, etc.) sourced from the US.

董劲松 DONG JINSONG 锦天城律师事务所高级合伙人 Senior Partner AllBright Law Offices
董劲松
DONG JINSONG
锦天城律师事务所高级合伙人
Senior Partner
AllBright Law Offices

The subjects of reporting specified by FATCA include such taxpayers as US citizens, US green card holders, holders of specific US visas, etc. Regardless of whether they are actually resident in the US, all such persons are required to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) with the IRS to report their global income, including their foreign assets, foreign companies, foreign trusts and gifts. If there is at least one financial account outside the US in which a taxpayer has a financial interest, or over which he or she has signature authority, and if the total value of all of his or her foreign financial accounts exceeds US$10,000 at any time during the filing year, he or she is required to file an FBAR in accordance with regulations.

Under pressure from the IRS, United Bank of Switzerland (UBS) provided the names of more than 4,450 US customers in August 2009 and paid a fine of US$780 million, reaching an out-of-court settlement. Germany, Italy and other countries also applied pressure on UBS, demanding that it publish the names of suspected tax fraudsters.

Furthermore, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) established the “automatic information exchange standard” as the new standard for the exchange of tax information. Influenced by FATCA, in January 2014 the OECD issued the Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information, which has been adopted and is being promoted by the G20.

范晓亮 FAN XIAOLIANG 锦天城律师事务所律师 Associate AllBright Law Offices
范晓亮
FAN XIAOLIANG
锦天城律师事务所律师
Associate
AllBright Law Offices

FATCA affects the compliance costs of Sino-American cross-border investment. A US investor in China is required to clarify the scope of the signature authority of the US taxpayers; pursuant to the co-operation plan, the American directors register and file with the IRS and file with the Chinese tax authority. The Chinese investor in the US then needs to consider FATCA withholding tax; pursuant to the co-operation plan, the IRS will report to China the US accounts and investments of the Chinese investor.

For example, in the past, Baidu invested US$300 million in Silicon Valley to establish a 200-employee research and development centre.

However, those Chinese employees who moved to California are required to pay US federal tax and state tax on their global income. Those Chinese employees are also required to file an FBAR for their own accounts, and those of the company, as well as for other financial assets (e.g., income sourced from real estate and the company). And if FATCA applies to amounts paid into China from the US, withholding tax may arise.

After the entry into effect of FATCA, the key points of the compliance practice of Chinese lawyers include:

(1) custody of accounts for US clients; (2) when the custodian is a US taxpayer, custody of accounts for non-US clients; (3) due diligence of the ultimate beneficiaries of trusts; (4) compliance of the bank accounts of US capital holding companies; (5) conduct of compliance investigations of the scope of authorization of the signature authority of American employees; (6) assisting clients in applying for FATCA participating financial institution global intermediary identification numbers; (7) assisting clients in paying attention to reasonable tax avoidance when business dealings occur with relevant American entities; (8) paying attention to avoiding causing illegal filing outcomes, e.g., using clients’ unreported funds to purchase immovable property; and (9) assisting US clients in investigating the details of their bank accounts opened outside the US.

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

FATCA has influenced the formation of the standards for balance of payments statistics, and the profound impact of China’s many years of opening to the outside world and globalization, and the large expansion in overseas investment has left China facing the heavy pressure of foreign account regulation. After many years of effort, China has made considerable progress in international co-ordination of tax regulation. To bring balance of payment statistics in line with new international standards, the State Council issued the Decision on Amending the Measures for Reporting Balance of Payments Statistics (Order No. 642) in January 2014.

Order No. 642 expressly states that, for Chinese residents and non-Chinese residents that engage in economic activities in China, tax reporting obligations are mandatory. In June of the same year, China and the US reached a preliminary agreement on the implementation of FATCA, with the parties agreeing to equal exchange of information.

In the amended reporting measures, the term “Chinese resident” means: someone who resides in China for at least one year; a Chinese person who goes abroad for a short period (residing abroad for less than one year); an enterprise or institution with legal personality established in China in accordance with the law (including foreign-invested enterprises and foreign-funded financial institutions); representative offices and establishments of foreign legal persons (excluding the offices of international organizations and consulates); and Chinese state agencies (including Chinese consulates abroad), and associations.

The scope of reporting of balance of payment statistics includes: (1) economic transactions between Chinese residents and non-Chinese residents; and (2) details of the foreign financial assets and liabilities of Chinese residents. Non-Chinese residents engaging in economic activities in China include: foreigners who purchase real estate in China; foreigners who invest in China; and foreigners who provide consulting services in China.

Dong Jinsong is a senior partner and Fan Xiaoliang is an associate at AllBright Law Offices

allbright_logo

上海市浦东新区银城中路501号

上海中心大厦11及12层 邮编:200120

11/F and 12/F, Shanghai Tower

No. 501 Yincheng Middle Road

Pudong New Area, Shanghai 200120, China

电话 Tel: +86 21 2051 1000

传真 Fax: +86 21 2051 1999

电子信箱 E-mail:

dongjinsong@allbrightlaw.com

fanxiaoliang@allbrightlaw.com

Whatsapp
Copy link
  • TAGS
  • AllBright Law Offices
  • Compliance
  • FATCA
  • Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
Previous articleHighlights of legal services for share placement on the NEEQ
Next articleAnalysis of disputed jurisdiction between arbitration and court
Leo

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

Fangda Partners adds Zhang Shihai
Market pulse

Fangda adds compliance partner in Shanghai

RBI Mis-selling and Digital Sales Rulesvideo
SNG & Partners

RBI tightening rules on financial product marketing

By Rajendra Patil, SNG & Partners
Yang Jingjing joins Hui Ye Law Firm
Market pulse

Tianyu Bio’s former vice president joins Hui Ye as counsel

MOST POPULAR

CBLJ IHCA Feature Image

In-house Counsel Awards 2026

Following months of market research, we have selected these outstanding in-house counsel and their teams

22 June 2026
CBLJ FOTY 2026

China Business Law Awards 2026

28 May 2026
Rising Star 2026 Featured Image

The A-List 2025-26: Rising Stars

26 March 2026

CORRESPONDENTS

Nominee shareholding: Transferring shares not yet due

By Jiang Xuan and Wang Zhongyu, Zhong Lun Law Firm
30 July 2026
18A listings amid a more nuanced regulation

18A listings amid a more nuanced regulation

By Stella Yeung and Stephen Luo, Jingtian & Gongcheng
29 July 2026

Debt restructuring centres in legal practice

By Wang Zhenxiang, Jingtian & Gongcheng
29 July 2026

FEATURES

Navigating phased-in ESG reporting

Green: Seen it or mean it?

As mandatory ESG reporting is phased in, green claims may face securities law and cross-border compliance scrutiny. General counsel and environmental lawyers assess the evolving challenges

7 August 2026

Choosing ideal lawyers

How can companies identify the right lawyer? A China Business Law Journal survey reveals what factors are truly driving the choices of general counsel

5 August 2026
Cao Haiyang and Zhou Xin's AI-native views

Going ‘AI-native’

Veteran counsel, tech CEO unpack ‘AI-native’ legal adoption

3 August 2026
General counsel and lawyers navigate phased-in ESG reporting
How can companies identify the right lawyer? A CBLJ survey reveals what factors are truly driving the choices of general counsel
Veteran counsel, tech CEO unpack ‘AI-native’ legal adoption

PRACTITIONERS' PERSPECTIVES

Banking Supervision Law look-through accountability

Look-through supervision and compliance of shareholders & controllers

By Xiang Fei, Tahota Law Firm
31 July 2026

Key takeaways from China’s new Ecological and Environmental Code

By Audrey Tao and Shen Haixiang, Hylands Law Firm
21 July 2026
Solar wind businesses compliance frameworks

Environmental compliance frameworks for renewable businesses

By Li Zhiheng, Kangda Law Firm
21 July 2026

Lexicon

Lexicon

State-funded companies and corporate governance

31 July 2026
LAW.ASIA

Asia’s leader in legal intelligence

91视频 is an award-winning portal providing news, analysis and expert advice on business law in Asia to in-house counsel, lawyers in private practice and other business and legal leaders. It features the proprietary editorial content and archives of our premium legal magazines – Asia Business Law Journal, China Business Law Journal and India Business Law Journal – along with videos, law firm listings, awards and much more. Produced by 91视频 Limited, an independent media company, 91视频 is multilingual, offering content in English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Find out more.
Follow 91视频
Law firms Awards Events Legal jobs ? Post a job
About us Archive Subscribe Contact us
Please send any press releases, deal announcements, details of new hires, newsletters and any other news items to: news@law.asia
  • Policy on advertising & sponsorship
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms & conditions of use
  • Privacy Policy
© Copyright 2026 91视频. All rights reserved.

Follow us on LinkedIn